5 Risks Associated with Traditional Freight Bill Payment Practices

6 min Read

Authored by Intelligent Audit 

Even though the summer heat wave tells you it’s not the time of year for retail store endcaps to be filled with Halloween candy corn, changing seasons can cause people to reflect on traditions. While many traditions produce warm memories, some belong in the past.  

Today, much of the freight industry believes the traditional freight invoice audit and payment practices are in the latter category. The Journal of Commerce adds,

 “The thorny issue of freight invoice accuracy has dogged virtually every buyer of capacity, but a wave of investment in recent months into payment technology providers serving the forwarding industry is a sign that venture capital firms think it is a solvable problem.”

As companies inside and out of the supply chain challenge the norms in freight bill payment, shippers can unlock a path to big savings with a proper understanding of using traditional methods in modern times.  

Risk 1: Traditional Payment Methods Are Complex and Confusing 

Over 40 years ago, the Motor Carrier Act of 1980 deregulated interstate trucking. Although this decreased pricing for shippers at the time, it also let freight bill payment regulations fly out the window. Today, individual companies decide on their rate structures across all transportation methods. As a result, this creates complications for shippers on regular shipments where it’s easy to get overcharged amidst basic rate factors, equipment variables, and accessorial costs—this opportunity for error increases when working with parcel reverse logistics or other specialized shipments. 

Risk 2: Errors Can and Often Do Happen Due to Shortcuts in Processing 

There is no need to take shortcuts in freight invoice audit and payment when an automated, ROI-generating service exists. Manually auditing freight bills is nearly impossible to accomplish at scale. Having people check every line item against contracts and validate that they should have been billed in the first place is a waste of time and money. Accessorials costs consume many lines on an invoice – consolidating them into one fee minimizes the opportunity for shippers to see if related rates are increasing along with fuel surcharges. Modern machine learning technology, such as automated anomaly detection, was designed to address these errors.  

Risk 3: Shippers Can Spend Too Much Time on Processing 

In the Western world, the phrase “time is money” is an adage that marks the business sphere. The direct and indirect costs associated with processing freight bill payments in-house are astronomical. Despite the flood of supply chain technology that claims to save time and human resources, shipping companies can find it challenging to differentiate between authentic help and a waste of time. The workforce consumed by freight bill payment processing should be put to better use within the company to build for generations to come.  

Risk 4: Payment Delays or Errors Can Result in Poor Carrier Relations 

As shipping companies think creatively to address the talent shortage, it’s vital to nourish current carrier relationships. Although many business relationships build due to proximity, aligned goals, and the like, a steady stream of expected income and related services holds the partnership. Poor freight bill payment visibility can turn into poor collaboration over time when other shipping companies are willing to offer new freight contracts with transparent payment agreements in addition to the fees associated with not paying your carriers on time and in full. Shippers need to realize the impact of appropriate payment solutions on carrier capacity and partnerships.  

Risk 5: A Cheaper Solution Doesn’t Always Mean a Better Solution 

Today, consumers face significantly rising costs with everything from items as small as oranges to bigger ticket products such as vehicles or homes. Although consumers should consider rising costs during goods and services purchases, it’s essential to understand that the cheapest solution is not always the best. When shippers thoroughly analyze their freight bill payment process, it’s easier to optimize transportation spending instead of passively letting better opportunities pass them.  

For example, a less-invasive audit might reveal some opportunities for savings, but a comprehensive audit can help shippers figure out which modes and lanes are best for each shipment. These actionable insights mean knowing when to apply zone-skipping, ensuring datasets reflect reality correctly, and creating a more strategic approach to transportation execution.  

Risk 6: Boost Efficiency With Secure Freight Invoice Audit and Payment System 

Sometimes the most straightforward traditions bring comfort simply due to their familiarity. Trying something new can be intimidating. However, the benefits are untapped if never attempted. While modern freight bill payment methods may be uncharted territory for many, Intelligent Audit has used its expertise and experience to address nearly every challenge across the industry. 

Integrated Parcel Audit

High-volume shippers who still manually perform freight audits and payment processes should evaluate and consider outsourcing their processes. These solutions could bring significant cost savings and efficiency opportunities. Through the e2open Global Parcel application, shippers can Investigate and recover opportunities regardless of the dollar amount. Invoice dispute submissions and resolution tasks are automated to ease the burden on accounting teams.  

To Learn More about how e2open’s Global Parcel shipping application, visit here. Our logistics solutions are augmented with direct integration for freight audit and payment processing via Intelligent Audit 

 

Latest

December 20, 2024

E2open Names Pawan Joshi as Chief Strategy Officer, Welcomes Rachit Lohani as Chief Product and Technology Officer

DALLAS – December 20, 2024 – E2open Parent Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ETWO), the connected supply chain SaaS platform with the largest multi-enterprise network, announces the promotion of Pawan Joshi to chief strategy officer (CSO), a new executive role responsible for driving corporate strategy and growth through strategic client engagement and break-through innovation. E2open also welcomes Rachit Lohani as chief product and technology officer (CPTO), a new executive role bringing together product management, engineering, and technology.

Read More
December 19, 2024

Shadow Planning: How to Answer the “What if” Question in Supply Chain Planning

In today’s volatile global supply chain environment, disruptions are not only possible—they’re inevitable. From global pandemics and natural disasters to sudden demand fluctuations and supplier issues, brand owners face constant challenges that threaten production continuity, customer satisfaction, and profitability. To combat this uncertainty, more companies are turning to shadow planning—a proactive approach to supply chain management that enables brand owners to prepare for the unexpected and maintain business continuity under various scenarios. 

Read More
December 9, 2024

Leveraging Data in Channel Management to Grow Market Coverage

At some point, you’ve likely heard the adage, “Go where your customers are.” Nowhere could this be truer than in channel management, where optimizing market coverage is a major priority and a driver of growth. However, the recent evolution of the channel landscape has added more complexity to the process. In just two decades, the number of channels available to both B2B and B2C consumers has expanded, creating a “good problem” for companies seeking to increase channel sales.

Read More
Subscribe to Receive e2open Updates

E2open Subscription Center

Interested in Learning More? Stay current with the latest e2open news – from company updates to thought-leadership pieces, and so much more!

Complete this form to subscribe to e2open updates.

Are you ready to boost your supply chain capabilities? Let's get started.

Let's Get Started